About Me

Name:Tim Z
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What to Believe?

     

Barack Obama has vaulted in astonishing fashion to the forefront of America’s current political elite with a combination of charisma, intelligence, and campaigning skill rarely seen. But now it appears we are beginning to get more of a glimpse of the “man behind the curtain.”

            At the top of barackobama.com we read “I am asking you to believe.” His followers have taken up a religious devotion and his campaign aids have at times been informed not to discuss issues but rather “how they came to Barack.” He packs stadiums and has viewers faint frequently when he speaks. Many evidently believe him to be the almighty: http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com/. However, before I come to believe in Barack, I want to know what he believes. It is evident on the few votes and stances on issues he has taken that he is far more liberal than even his Democrat opponent Hilary Clinton, but what are his deepest held core values?

Obama evidently left the Muslim faith of his father and has embraced the Christian faith at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago (http://www.tucc.org/about.htm ) under the guidance of Reverend Jeremiah Wright. The Reverend Wright has been his pastor for more than 20 years and was a member of and advisor to his campaign. Wright gave the sermon that inspired the title of Obama’s book “The Audacity of Hope”, baptized his children, married him to his wife Michelle, and has been Obama’s mentor and advisor.

Recently we have also now seen that Reverend Wright hates America, is obscenely racist, and an anti-Semitic supporter of Louis Farrakhan:

The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme." –Reverend Wright

(After 9/11): "We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost." –Reverend Wright

Obama has now been forced to try and distance himself from his pastor of 23 years (though he is still a member of the hateful church). He says he does not agree with his own pastor, but there still remain other big questions. What kind of views does Obama have to associate himself with a Reverend Wright? What kind of parent would bring his children to this church weekly?

Tonight on Fox’s “Hannity and Colmes” Sean Hannity was asked by the Democrat strategist if every child that goes to this church should never be able to one day become president. I will give the Answer Sean should have given: A man who would seek guidance from Reverend Wright or bring his children there does not have the judgment to be President of the United States of America.

God Bless America.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defining a Threat

 

On September 11th 2001 America was attacked by cowardly terrorists who killed nearly 3000 American civilians. The civilians were not collateral damage or somehow accidentally killed, but killed because they were infidels. It was the day when terrorism was truly brought home to America. How much do we remember that day and how seriously does the West take the threat posed by Islamic terrorism?

I will quickly move beyond the leftists who demand that the term “Islamic Terrorism” is racist or bigoted. Nearly everyday someone somewhere in the world dies from a terrorist who kills because of his faith while screaming “Allah Ackbar.” Those fools may wish to have their head in the sand and ignore reality, but I do not wish to indulge them further here. My main focus is an attempt to communicate the size of the threat posed by “radical Islam.”

Nearly every time the issue of terrorism reaches the national dialogue we are assured ad infinitum that those who kill in the name of Islam are a tiny minority of radicals. What does this mean? There are between 1.1 and 1.8 billion Muslims in the world. Assuming 1,500,000,000 (a number in the middle), that would mean if 9 out of 10 are “moderate” we are at war with 150,000,000 radicals. Germany currently has approximately 82,000,000 inhabitants (a little over half the number of radicals we face if 90% of Muslims are moderate) and I suspect few would see going to war with Germany again as easy.

With these frightening figures we have already gotten ahead of ourselves; how do we define moderate? Do we define moderate as nonviolent? Today the “moderate” Fatah movement claimed responsibility for their suicide bombers attacking a shopping area full of civilians in Israel. How do we differentiate them from the “radical” Hamas? Can we then define “moderate” as being decent people (indecency doesn’t necessitate terrorism, but decency certainly helps prevent it)? There are many social ills in the world, but there are a few that are particularly disgusting. Predominately in Muslim nations there is a practice of female genital mutilation. Parents and religious officials take their young daughters (usually under 8) and hold them down while someone cuts off their clitoris. Recently the New York Times reported that 96 percent in Indonesia (most Muslims reside in Southeast Asia) had done this to their daughters before the age of 14. How far is someone who would so disgustingly harm their own little daughter for their faith from harming others for their faith? How are so many able to so quickly shrug off this issue as an insignificant minority?

Are we at war with all Islam? No, a war against 1.5 billion cannot be won. Are all Muslims evil?  No, many Muslims were appalled at 9/11. Many others celebrated. Those Muslims who participate in terror, approve of terror, or even those who harm their own daughters constitute a great number of amoral people that represent a great threat to the world. They desire us dead or submitted to them. I believe, particularly nearing an election, this war needs to be better understood as the greatest issue of our time. All of civilization is at threat and the Islamo-Fascists desire to submit us all to their brand of Islam and Barack Obama will not be able to sit down and talk everything out with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I fear for the world every time when I see a poll that shows how many Americans no longer see how great this threat is. Before you go to the polls tomorrow (for many of us) and especially in November try to imagine living under Sharia law or what would be done to your daughter if the Islamo-facists were successful. It will be no easy task to stop them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Consent of the Governed

   

HANDGUN CASE: The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will decide whether the District of Columbia can ban handguns, a case that could produce the most in-depth examination of the constitutional right to "keep and bear arms" in nearly 70 years.

WHEN: The court probably will hear oral arguments in March, with a decision expected before the end of June.

CASE FOCUS: The main issue is whether the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns or instead merely sets forth the collective right of states to maintain militias. The former interpretation would permit fewer restrictions on gun ownership.

 

Supreme Court Will Hear Guns Case

By The Associated Press

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

 

            Every election cycle we hear two versions of interpretation from the left about the second amendment. According to their political ideology it simply does not entitle individuals to possess weapons or at best they are in favor of supporting hunting rights. From those Democrats who wish to appear moderate we will watch them do silly stunts of dressing in fatigues and going hunting somewhere.

            The problem is that the 2nd amendment simply has nothing to do with hunting. Our Founding Fathers were most concerned with protecting us the people from the government:

 

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

-The Declaration of Independence

           

It is simply impossible for an unarmed people to be truly free. Any freedoms they do receive will be at the mercy of the government with its consent, and any man who is at the mercy of a governing official is not truly free. The armed society is ruled by its consent and is able to protect its rights that are inalienable and never to be altered or granted by the consent of others:

 

they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

-The Declaration of Independence

 

As a country we stand at a great crossroads. Will America truly remain free? Or more importantly, will the Supreme Court allow us to remain free?

 

 

-Tim

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vive la France!

    Contrary to the constant drum beat of the left that the world is becoming increasingly hostile to America or that "we have turned our backs on our Allies", consider the recent elections of some of America's oldest allies. During Bush's presidency three have replaced their anti-American leaders with pro-American conservative alternatives (Germany, Canada, and most recently France). 
    The French President's speech to Congress is a must read:

Madam Speaker,
Mr. President,
Ladies and Gentlemen of the United States Congress,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

The state of our friendship and our alliance is strong.

Friendship, first and foremost, means being true to one's friends. Since the United States first appeared on the world scene, the loyalty between the French and American people has never failed. And far from being weakened by the vicissitudes of History, it has never ceased growing stronger.

Friends may have differences; they may have disagreements; they may have disputes.

But in times of difficulty, in times of hardship, friends stand together, side by side; they support each other; and help one another.

In times of difficulty, in times of hardship, America and France have always stood side by side, supported one another, helped one another, fought for each other's freedom.

The United States and France remain true to the memory of their common history, true to the blood spilled by their children in common battles. But they are not true merely to the memory of what they accomplished together in the past. They remain true, first and foremost, to the same ideal, the same principles, the same values that have always united them.

The deliberations of your Congress are conducted under the double gaze of Washington and Lafayette. Lafayette, whose 250th birthday we are celebrating this year and who was the first foreign dignitary, in 1824, to address a joint session of Congress. What was it that brought these two men—so far apart in age and background—together, if not their faith in common values, the heritage of the Enlightenment, the same love for freedom and justice?

Upon first meeting Washington, Lafayette told him: "I have come here to learn, not to teach." It was this new spirit and youth of the Old World seeking out the wisdom of the New World that opened a new era for all of humanity.

From the very beginning, the American dream meant putting into practice the dreams of the Old World.

From the very beginning, the American dream meant proving to all mankind that freedom, justice, human rights and democracy were no utopia but were rather the most realistic policy there is and the most likely to improve the fate of each and every person.

America did not tell the millions of men and women who came from every country in the world and who—with their hands, their intelligence and their heart—built the greatest nation in the world: "Come, and everything will be given to you." She said: "Come, and the only limits to what you'll be able to achieve will be your own courage and your own talent." America embodies this extraordinary ability to grant each and every person a second chance.

Here, both the humblest and most illustrious citizens alike know that nothing is owed to them and that everything has to be earned. That's what constitutes the moral value of America. America did not teach men the idea of freedom; she taught them how to practice it. And she fought for this freedom whenever she felt it to be threatened somewhere in the world. It was by watching America grow that men and women understood that freedom was possible.

What made America great was her ability to transform her own dream into hope for all mankind.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The men and women of my generation heard their grandparents talk about how in 1917, America saved France at a time when it had reached the final limits of its strength, which it had exhausted in the most absurd and bloodiest of wars.

The men and women of my generation heard their parents talk about how in 1944, America returned to free Europe from the horrifying tyranny that threatened to enslave it.

Fathers took their sons to see the vast cemeteries where, under thousands of white crosses so far from home, thousands of young American soldiers lay who had fallen not to defend their own freedom but the freedom of all others, not to defend their own families, their own homeland, but to defend humanity as a whole.

Fathers took their sons to the beaches where the young men of America had so heroically landed. They read them the admirable letters of farewell that those 20-year-old soldiers had written to their families before the battle to tell them: "We don't consider ourselves heroes. We want this war to be over. But however much dread we may feel, you can count on us." Before they landed, Eisenhower told them: "The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you."

And as they listened to their fathers, watched movies, read history books and the letters of soldiers who died on the beaches of Normandy and Provence, as they visited the cemeteries where the star-spangled banner flies, the children of my generation understood that these young Americans, 20 years old, were true heroes to whom they owed the fact that they were free people and not slaves. France will never forget the sacrifice of your children.

To those 20-year-old heroes who gave us everything, to the families of those who never returned, to the children who mourned fathers they barely got a chance to know, I want to express France's eternal gratitude.

On behalf of my generation, which did not experience war but knows how much it owes to their courage and their sacrifice; on behalf of our children, who must never forget; to all the veterans who are here today and, notably the seven I had the honor to decorate yesterday evening, one of whom, Senator Inouye, belongs to your Congress, I want to express the deep, sincere gratitude of the French people. I want to tell you that whenever an American soldier falls somewhere in the world, I think of what the American army did for France. I think of them and I am sad, as one is sad to lose a member of one's family.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The men and women of my generation remember the Marshall Plan that allowed their fathers to rebuild a devastated Europe. They remember the Cold War, during which America again stood as the bulwark of the Free World against the threat of new tyranny.

I remember the Berlin crisis and Kennedy who unhesitatingly risked engaging the United States in the most destructive of wars so that Europe could preserve the freedom for which the American people had already sacrificed so much. No one has the right to forget. Forgetting, for a person of my generation, would be tantamount to self-denial.

But my generation did not love America only because she had defended freedom. We also loved her because for us, she embodied what was most audacious about the human adventure; for us, she embodied the spirit of conquest. We loved America because for us, America was a new frontier that was continuously pushed back—a constantly renewed challenge to the inventiveness of the human spirit.

My generation shared all the American dreams. Our imaginations were fueled by the winning of the West and Hollywood. By Elvis Presley, Duke Ellington, Hemingway. By John Wayne, Charlton Heston, Marilyn Monroe, Rita Hayworth. And by Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, fulfilling mankind's oldest dream.

What was so extraordinary for us was that through her literature, her cinema and her music, America always seemed to emerge from adversity even greater and stronger; that instead of causing America to doubt herself, such ordeals only strengthened her belief in her values.

What makes America strong is the strength of this ideal that is shared by all Americans and by all those who love her because they love freedom.

America's strength is not only a material strength, it is first and foremost a spiritual and moral strength. No one expressed this better than a black pastor who asked just one thing of America: that she be true to the ideal in whose name he—the grandson of a slave—felt so deeply American. His name was Martin Luther King. He made America a universal role model.

The world still remembers his words—words of love, dignity and justice. America heard those words and America changed. And the men and women who had doubted America because they no longer recognized her began loving her again.

Fundamentally, what are those who love America asking of her, if not to remain forever true to her founding values?

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Today as in the past, as we stand at the beginning of the 21st century, it is together that we must fight to defend and promote the values and ideals of freedom and democracy that men such as Washington and Lafayette invented together.

Together we must fight against terrorism. On September 11, 2001, all of France—petrified with horror—rallied to the side of the American people. The front-page headline of one of our major dailies read: "We are all American." And on that day, when you were mourning for so many dead, never had America appeared to us as so great, so dignified, so strong. The terrorists had thought they would weaken you. They made you greater. The entire world felt admiration for the courage of the American people. And from day one, France decided to participate shoulder to shoulder with you in the war in Afghanistan. Let me tell you solemnly today: France will remain engaged in Afghanistan as long as it takes, because what's at stake in that country is the future of our values and that of the Atlantic Alliance. For me, failure is not an option. Terrorism will not win because democracies are not weak, because we are not afraid of this barbarism. America can count on France.

Together we must fight against proliferation. Success in Libya and progress under way in North Korea shows that nuclear proliferation is not inevitable. Let me say it here before all of you: The prospect of an Iran armed with nuclear weapons is unacceptable. The Iranian people is a great people. It deserves better than the increased sanctions and growing isolation to which its leaders condemn it. Iran must be convinced to choose cooperation, dialogue and openness. No one must doubt our determination.

Together we must help the people of the Middle East find the path of peace and security. To the Israeli and Palestinian leaders I say this: Don't hesitate! Risk peace! And do it now! The status quo hides even greater dangers: that of delivering Palestinian society as a whole to the extremists that contest Israel's existence; that of playing into the hands of radical regimes that are exploiting the deadlock in the conflict to destabilize the region; that of fueling the propaganda of terrorists who want to set Islam against the West. France wants security for Israel and a State for the Palestinians.

Together we must help the Lebanese people affirm their independence, their sovereignty, their freedom, their democracy. What Lebanon needs today is a broad-based president elected according to the established schedule and in strict respect of the Constitution. France stands engaged alongside all the Lebanese. It will not accept attempts to subjugate the Lebanese people.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

America feels it has the vocation to inspire the world. Because she is the most powerful country in the world. Because, for more than two centuries, she has striven to uphold the ideals of democracy and freedom. But this stated responsibility comes with duties, the first of which is setting an example.

Those who love this nation which, more than any other, has demonstrated the virtues of free enterprise expect America to be the first to denounce the abuses and excesses of a financial capitalism that sets too great a store on speculation. They expect her to commit fully to the establishment of the necessary rules and safeguards. The America I love is the one that encourages entrepreneurs, not speculators.

Those who admire the nation that has built the world's greatest economy and has never ceased trying to persuade the world of the advantages of free trade expect her to be the first to promote fair exchange rates. The yuan is already everyone's problem. The dollar cannot remain solely the problem of others. If we're not careful, monetary disarray could morph into economic war. We would all be its victims.

Those who love the country of wide open spaces, national parks and nature reserves expect America to stand alongside Europe in leading the fight against global warming that threatens the destruction of our planet. I know that each day, in their cities and states, the American people are more aware of the stakes and determined to act. This essential fight for the future of humanity must be all of America's fight.

Those who have not forgotten that it was the United States that, at the end of the Second World War, raised hopes for a new world order are asking America to take the lead in the necessary reforms of the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the G8. Our globalized world must be organized for the 21st century, not for the last century. The emerging countries we need for global equilibrium must be given their rightful place.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to express one last conviction: Trust Europe.

In this unstable, dangerous world, the United States of America needs a strong, determined Europe. With the simplified treaty I proposed to our partners, the European Union is about to emerge from 10 years of discussions on its institutions and 10 years of paralysis. Soon it will have a stable president and a more powerful High Representative for foreign and security policy, and it must now reactivate the construction of its military capacities.

The ambition I am proposing to our partners is based on a simple observation: There are more crises than there are capacities to face them. NATO cannot be everywhere. The EU must be able to act, as it did in the Balkans and in the Congo, and as it will tomorrow on the border of Sudan and Chad. For that the Europeans must step up their efforts.

My approach is purely pragmatic. Having learned from history, I want the Europeans, in the years to come, to have the means to shoulder a growing share of their defense. Who could blame the United States for ensuring its own security? No one. Who could blame me for wanting Europe to ensure more of its own security? No one. All of our Allies, beginning with the United States, with whom we most often share the same interests and the same adversaries, have a strategic interest in a Europe that can assert itself as a strong, credible security partner.

At the same time, I want to affirm my attachment to NATO. I say it here before this Congress: The more successful we are in the establishment of a European Defense, the more France will be resolved to resume its full role in NATO.

I would like France, a founding member of our Alliance and already one of its largest contributors, to assume its full role in the effort to renew NATO's instruments and means of action and, in this context, to allow its relations with the Alliance to evolve.

This is no time for theological quarrels but for pragmatic responses to make our security tools more effective and operational in the face of crises. The EU and NATO must march hand in hand.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I want to be your friend, your ally and your partner. But a friend who stands on his own two feet. An independent ally. A free partner.

France must be stronger. I am determined to carry through with the reforms that my country has put off for all too long. I will not turn back, because France has turned back for all too long. My country has enormous assets. While respecting its unique identity, I want to put it into a position to win all the battles of globalization. I passionately love France. I am lucid about the work that remains to be accomplished.

It is this ambitious France that I have come to present to you today. A France that comes out to meet America to renew the pact of friendship and the alliance that Washington and Lafayette sealed in Yorktown.

Together let us be worthy of their example, let us be equal to their ambition, let us be true to their memories!

Long live the United States of America!

Vive la France!

Long live French-American friendship!

                                                                                                                          - http://www.nysun.com/article/66054?page_no=4

 

It will be a great day when politicians from the American left can give such an amazing speech and convey love for their homeland. Instead liberal senators compare our troops to Nazis, Hollywood gives us movies slandering our troops where the good guys are terrorists, and it is hard to tell the difference between Al Jazeera and MSNBC.

 

Hopefully if French President Sarcozy is successful reforming France he will consider immigrating to Washington and reforming the DNC?



-Tim 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New World Order

The new world Order


Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. Isaiah 5:20

  

    The popular view of the conspiracy proponent is that a one world order will arise (or for some has arisen) through an evil cabal of large corporations, government leaders, and secret organizations (skull and bones, masons, etc…). While I am skeptical of popular conspiracy theories I do believe there is a “New World Order” that looks to take over all of civilization, only not in the aforementioned popular view.

            The insidious cabal that looks to usurp civilization isn’t even new. The order was founded in a small garden many millennia ago when mankind rebelled against its given morality and decided to try and make itself into gods able to decide good and evil for itself. This cabal of rebellion and sin arises and falls from time to time in human history, but is always on the march, always plotting. Most recently we have seen this new order take root in the left of America. The left confuses tolerance and freedom for license, and has taken that war on all traditional Judeo-Christian culture and manifested it into events such as the Folsom Street Fair.

            The Fair illustrates the truth that within man is the capacity to act upon its divine nature or its animal nature and when the left abandons the divine we are left without traditional morality and only the animal nature remains:

   female_slave_on_dog_collar_folsom-street-fair-2007.JPGpony_perversion_folsom-street-fair-2007.JPGfolsom-street-fair-2007-101.jpgpublic_sex_folsom-street-fair-2007.JPG

  

    

And if one doubts the nature of its attacks on traditional Judeo-Christian values below is a toddler at the event and the Fair’s official logo mocking Christ at the last supper:

 folsomtwins002.jpgfolsom.jpgoral_sodomy_3_covered_folsom-street-fair-2007-222.JPG

This animal nature is intrinsic in all fallen mankind and is only suppressed by the absolute morals we receive from above. Through these given morals man arises to its divine nature and will become appalled at such wanton depravity. 

    This event coupled with last month’s Exotic Erotic ball in San Francisco or the recent attacks there of its churches begin to illustrate the “San Francisco Values” that were warned about prior to the last national election. This city has become indicative of the values of a vocal minority in this nation that desires its order of licentiousness to rule over all of civilization. This order has largely taken over a city and a major political party in America. That political party now is in power and the Speaker of the House of this Republic is from San Francisco and refused to condemn the mocking of Christ or an event in her home’s streets where toddlers with leather dog collars watched men masturbate and witnessed orgies.

 

“But people who live in the city told Francis if being out of sync means being progressive and tolerant, they agree.

“I think we are a little on the edge,” said Oscar Bevilasqua who lives in the city. “We are different -- that's what makes us what we are.”

“I think the United States needs a dose of progressive San Francisco politics,” said tourist Will Rainford. “I think we need to wake up.””

http://www.nbc11.com/news/14449273/detail.html

 

 

 

God help us all!

 

 

Thanks,

Tim

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Children of The Village

    “And ‘Parent’?” questioned the D.H.C.

    There was an uneasy silence. Several of the boys blushed. They had not yet learned to draw the significant but very fine distinction between smut and pure science. One, at last, had the courage to raise a hand.

    “Human beings used to be …” he hesitated; the blood rushed to his cheeks. “Well, they used to be viviparous.”

    “Quite right.” The Director nodded approvingly.

    “And when the babies were decanted …”

    “Born,” came the correction.

    “Well, then they were the parents – I mean, not the babies, of course; the other ones.” The poor boy was overwhelmed with confusion.

    “In brief,” The Director summed up, “the parents were the father and the mother.” The smut that was really science fell with a crash into the boys’ eye avoiding silence. “Mother,” he repeated loudly rubbing in the science; and, leaning back in his chair, “These,” he said gravely, “are unpleasant facts; I know it. But most historical facts are unpleasant.” …

“For you must remember that in those days of gross viviparous reproduction, children were brought up by their parents and not in State Conditioning Centres.”

-          Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World

            There is a cultural battle in this country and the outcome appears to be an inevitable victory for the Conservative/Religious Right and I am not talking about the Second Coming. The truth lies in America’s demographic makeup and the simple numbers of reproduction. There is a 41% fertility gap between secular and religious people and political conservatives have an average of near 80% more kids than secular liberals (Arthur Brooks of Syracuse University). Combine these numbers with the facts that children tend to believe as their parents do and that the frequency with which a person attends a religious service is a top indicator in how people tend to vote and you arrive at a bleak future for the left. (Of course the future is always bleak for a political ideology that devalues human life by making the cornerstone of its agenda abortion on demand.)

            Unfortunately, now remember that I conditioned my prediction of victory with the word “appears.” The left is not unaware of its statistically sterile existence and it has prepared for the future. If the other side has more children, then they simply need to be taken and reeducated. Who can debate the crushing liberal bend of America’s public schools? The examples are endless and I am not here to right a book, but a blog. However, consider the “That’s a Family” video being shown to third graders about homosexual couples, or when a Massachusetts judge ordered the gay agenda taught to kindergarten children without parental notification, as "the rights of religious freedom and parental control over the upbringing of children … would undermine teaching and learning…" (Another recent survey by the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard has reported that 8% of high school parents and 4% of middle school parents nationwide approve of schools teaching “that homosexuality is acceptable”) Also never forget how doubting Darwin is a mortal sin in public schools or how American history must always be portrayed negatively, and never dare mention anything about that Nazarene carpenter around Christmas.

            Has the left’s strategy worked?  Once our public schools have had their way and America’s children leave the public university they are much more ready to embrace the left, Britney kissing Madonna, and voting “properly,” while most will attend church less and about a third will never attend regularly again.

 

Today from the far left in Venezuela:

All schools, public and private, must admit state inspectors and submit to the government’s new educational system, or be closed and nationalized, with the state taking responsibility for the education of their children, Chavez said.

A new curriculum will be ready by the end of this school year, and new textbooks are being developed to help educate “the new citizen,” said Chavez’s brother and education minister Adan Chavez, who joined him in a televised ceremony at the opening of a public school in the eastern town of El Tigre.

-Sep 17 12:52 PM US/Eastern
By IAN JAMES
Associated Press Writer

            That may be all the way down in Communist Venezuela, but don’t forget today we have our Presidential frontrunner who believes It Takes a Village.

 

Thanks,

Tim

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The City Gate

The city gate in ancient times was the place of public proceedings. Discussions, judgments, and debate could occur at this focal point of the city. In this greatest of all countries, our center for public discussion and exchange of ideas has taken place in our media. However, our gate has not been open, but rather encircled and guarded by this nation’s liberal elite. To enter the discussion in times past one had to pay the toll to enter the gate, and the price was steep. It was paid by toeing the line of liberal ideology, bowing at the altar of political correctness, and being seen as “worthy to be heard.”  How this came to be is the topic of another discussion, but it is enough to say that it should not be. America was founded as a nation of the people. The common man is supposed to have the power, yet how can he without a voice?

            As evidenced by this blog times have begun to change. The old guard mainstream media still control their outlets and guard them with an unrelenting vigil. Yet those who have refused to pay the toll have discovered a new place for public discussion. Bar us from your networks and mock the people in your papers, but a new media has emerged. I am excited to be given this opportunity to participate here, and welcome dialogue from any who see my posts as worthy to be read and replied to.

 

Thanks,

Tim

timzema@yahoo.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »